noun
A mid-engine layout describes the placement of an
automobile engine
between the rear and front axles. Another term for this is
mid-ship, though that term is used mostly by British and Japanese
manufacturers.
Benefits
The mid-engine layout is typically chosen for its
relatively favorable
weight
distribution. The heaviest component is nearer to the center of
the vehicle, reducing the vehicle's
moment of
inertia and making it easier and faster to turn the vehicle to
a new direction. Also the engine weight is more evenly carried by
all the wheels with this layout. As a result, vehicle stability,
traction, and ride quality are naturally improved when turning,
braking, and accelerating.
Mounting the engine in the middle instead of the
front of the vehicle puts more weight over the rear tires so they
have more traction and provide more assistance to the front tires
in braking the vehicle, with less chance of rear wheel lockup and
less chance of a skid or spin out. If the mid-engine vehicle is
also rear-drive (as almost all of them are) the added weight on the
rear tires can also improve acceleration on slippery surfaces,
providing much of the benefit of all wheel drive without the added
weight and expense of all wheel drive components. The mid-engine
layout make ABS brakes and traction control systems work better, by
providing them more traction to control. The mid-engine layout may
make a vehicle safer, since an accident can occur if a vehicle
cannot stay in its own lane around a curve or is unable to stop
quickly enough. And additionally, mid-engine design is a way to
provide additional empty crush space in the front of the automobile
between the bumper and the windshield, which can then be used in a
frontal collision to absorb more of the impact force to minimize
penetration into the passenger compartment of the vehicle.
In most automobiles, and in sports cars
especially, ideal
car handling
requires balanced traction between the front and rear wheels when
cornering in order to maximize the possible speed around curves
without sliding out. This balance is harder to achieve when the
heavy weight of the engine is located far to the front or far to
the rear of the vehicle. Some automobile designs strive to balance
the fore and aft weight distribution by other means such as putting
the engine in the front and the transmission and battery in the
rear of the vehicle. Some of the same benefits are gained, but at
the cost of greater
moment of
inertia compared to the mid-engine layout, making it harder and
less responsive to turn the vehicle to a new direction.
Another benefit comes when the heavy mass of the
engine is located close to the back of the seats. It makes it
easier for the suspension to absorb the force of bumps so the
riders feel a smoother ride. But in sports cars this benefit is
once again utilized to increase performance and is usually more
than offset by stiffer
shocks.
This layout also allows the transmission and
motor to be directly bolted to each other - with independent
suspension on the driven wheels this removes the need for the
chassis to transfer engine torque reaction.
Drawbacks
The largest drawback of mid-engine cars is
packaging; most mid-engine vehicles are two-seat vehicles. The
engine in effect pushes the passenger compartment forward towards
the front
axle (if engine
is behind driver). Exceptions typically involve larger vehicles of
unusual length or height in which the passengers can share space
between the axles with the engine, which can be between them or
below them, as in some Toyota vans, large trucks and busses.
Like any layout where the engine is not in the
front of the car facing the wind, the traditional
"engine-behind-the-passengers" layout makes engine cooling more
difficult, and this has been a problem in some cars such as the
Porsche
914, which is air cooled rather than having a front mounted
coolant system. But this problem seems to have been largely solved
in newer designs. For example, the
Saleen S7
employs large engine-compartment vents on the sides and rear of the
bodywork to help dissipate heat from its very high-output
engine.
Variations
Traditionally, the term mid-engine has been
applied to cars having the engine located between the driver and
the rear drive axles. This layout is referred to here as
RMR layout.
Sports and racing cars typically have this mid-engine layout, as
these vehicle's
handling
characteristics are more important than other features, such as
practicality. Additionally the mechanical layout and packaging of a
RMR car is substantially different than that of a front engine or
rear engine car.
A subset of Front-Rear when the engine is in
front of the driver, but fully behind the front axle line, the
layout is sometimes called Front Mid engine Rear
FMR layout
instead of the less-specific term front-engine. In handling and
vehicle layout FMR is substantially the same as FR. Some vehicles
could be classified as FR or FMR depending on the factory installed
engine (I4 vs I6). Historically most classical FR cars such as the
Ford Models T and A would qualify as a FMR engine car/
Additionally, the difference between FR and FMR may be as little as
a few millimeters of engine protrusion in front of the front axle
line. Not all manufactures will use the Front-Mid
designation.
Examples
RMR layout
Traditional engine between driver and rear drive
axle
FMR layout
RWD with engine between driver and front axle
- Note: Some of the listed vehicles will be referred to as
Front-Engine RWD by their respective manufactures.
MF layout
Mid-ship
Front-wheel
drive, with engine in front/parallel to driver
M4 layout
Mid-ship,
four-wheel
drive, with engine between axles:
midship in German: Mittelmotor
midship in Swedish:
Mittmotor