User Contributed Dictionary
Noun
menoFinnish
Declension
fi-decl-valo menItalian
Adverb
menoDerived terms
Verb
meno- Form of First-person singular present tense, menare
Slovak
Etymology
From , from .Noun
Swahili
Noun
menoExtensive Definition
Meno is a Socratic
dialogue written by Plato. Written in the
Socratic
dialectic style, it attempts to determine the definition of
virtue, or arete,
meaning in this case virtue in general, rather than particular
virtues (e.g., justice, temperance, etc.). The goal is a common
definition that applies equally to all particular virtues. Socrates moves the
discussion past the philosophical confusion, or aporia, created by Meno's
paradox with the introduction of new Platonic ideas: the theory
of knowledge as recollection, anamnesis, and in the final
lines a movement towards Platonic
idealism.
Characters
Plato's Meno is a Socratic dialogue in which the
two main speakers, Socrates and Meno, discuss human virtue: whether
or not it can be taught, whether it is shared by all human beings,
and whether it is one quality or many. As is typical of a Socratic
dialogue, there is more than one theme discussed within Meno. One
feature of the dialogue is Socrates' use of one of Meno's slaves
to demonstrate his idea of anamnesis, that certain
knowledge is innate and "recollected" by the soul through proper
inquiry. Another often noted feature of the dialogue is the brief
appearance of Anytus, a member of
a prominent Athenian family who later participated in the prosecution
of Socrates.
Meno is visiting Athens with a large entourage of
slaves attending him. Young, good-looking and well-born, Meno is
perhaps a sophist from
Thessaly,
but Plato is not absolutely clear about this. Meno says early on in
the dialogue that he has held forth many times on the subject of
virtue, and in front of large audiences.
Virtue
The dialogue begins with Meno asking Socrates to tell
him if virtue can be taught. Socrates says that he is clueless
about what virtue is, and so is everyone else he knows (71b). Meno
responds that virtue is different for different people, that what
is virtuous for a man is to conduct himself in the city so that he
helps his friends, injures his enemies, and takes care all the
while that he personally comes to no harm. Virtue is different for
a woman, he says. Her domain is the management of the household,
and she is supposed to obey her husband. He says that children
(male and female) have their own proper virtue, and so do old men
-free- or slave, as you like (71e). Socrates says he finds this
odd. He suspects that there must be some virtue common to all human
beings.
Socrates rejects the idea that human virtue
depends on a person's gender or age. He leads Meno towards the idea
that virtues are common to all people, that temperance
("sophrosunê"- exercising self control) and justice ("dikê,
dikaiosunê"- refraining from harming other people) are virtues even
in children and old men (73b). Meno proposes to Socrates that the
"capacity to govern men" may be a virtue common to all people.
Socrates points out to the slaveholder that "governing well" cannot
be a virtue of a slave, because then he would not be a slave
(73c,d).
One of the errors that Socrates points out is
that Meno lists many particular virtues without defining a common
feature inherent to virtues which makes them thus. Socrates remarks
that Meno makes many out of one, like somebody who breaks a plate
(77a).
Meno proposes that virtue is the desire for good
things and the power to get them. Socrates points out that this
raises a second problem- many people do not recognize evil (77d,e).
The discussion then turns to how to account for the fact that so
many people are mistaken about good and evil, and take one for the
other. Socrates asks Meno to consider whether good things must be
acquired virtuously in order to be really good (78b). Socrates
leads onto the question of whether virtue is one thing or
many.
No satisfactory definition of virtue emerges in
the Meno. Socrates' comments however show that he considers a
successful definition to be unitary, rather than a list of
varieties of virtue, that it must contain all and only those terms
which are genuine instances of virtue, and must not be
circular.
Meno eventually throws up his hands at the
problem, confessing that he is no longer so sure of what virtue is.
He seems agitated and compares Socrates to a "broad torpedo fish"
that can numb, and admits that he is "quite perplexed". He says
that Socrates has made him numb in his mind and tongue (80a,b).
Socrates argues that the reason for this comparison is that Meno, a
"handsome" man, is inviting counter-comparisons because of his own
vanity. Socrates tells Meno that he only resembles the torpedo fish
if the torpedo fish is numbed itself in making others
numb(80c).
Meno's paradox
Meno asks Socrates how a person can look for
something when he has no idea what it is. How can he know when he
has arrived at the truth when he does not already know what the
truth is?(80d) Socrates avoids this sophistical paradox by pointing
out that, by using this logic, man could neither search for what he
does know, because he would already know it, nor for what he does
not know, because he would not know for what he was looking. (This
is not to say that Socrates or Plato deny the strength of this
paradox. Socrates does not take the position that knowledge can be
sought; as is explained, his theory of knowledge is that it is
never acquired, only ever recollected.)
Plato subsequently discusses his own theory of
knowledge through Socrates, that it is "recollection" from the past
lives of the immortal soul.(81d)
Dialogue with Meno's slave
Socrates requests to demonstrate his point on one of Meno's slaves. Meno obliges and Socrates asks Meno if the boy speaks Greek, and when Meno assures him that he was born and bred in his household, Socrates begins one of the most influential dialogues of Western philosophy regarding the argument for innate knowledge. By drawing geometric figures in the ground Socrates demonstrates that the slave is initially unaware of how to find twice the area of a square. Socrates then said that before he got ahold of him the slave (who has been picked at random from Meno's entourage) has spoken "well and fluently" on the subject of a square double the size of a given square (84c). Socrates comments that this "numbing" he caused in the slave did him no harm (84b).Socrates then draws a second square figure on the
diagonal so that the slave can see that by adding vertical and
horizontal lines touching the corners of the square, the double of
its area is created. He gets the slave to agree that this is twice
the size of the original square and says that he has "spontaneously
recovered" knowledge he knew from a past life (85d) without having
been taught. Socrates is satisfied that new beliefs were "newly
aroused" in the slave.
After witnessing the example with the slave boy,
Meno tells Socrates that he thinks that Socrates is correct in his
theory of recollection, to which Socrates replies, “I think I am. I
shouldn’t like to take my oath on the whole story, but one thing I
am ready to fight for as long as I can, in word and act—that is,
that we shall be better, braver, and more active men if we believe
it right to look for what we don’t know...” (86b).
Anytus
When Anytus appears,
Socrates praises him as the son of Anthemion, who earned his
fortune with intelligence and hard work. He says that Anthemion had
his son well-educated, and Anytus, the beneficiary of a
well-meaning father, must both be virtuous and know what it is.
Anytus comments on Sophists, and saying that he neither knows any,
nor cares to know any. Socrates then questions why it is that men
do not always produce sons of the same virtue as themselves. He
alludes to other notable male figures, such as Pericles and
Thucydides, and
casts doubt on whether these men produced sons as capable of virtue
as themselves. Anytus becomes offended and accuses Socrates of
slander, warning him to be careful expressing such opinions.
After speaking to Anytus, Socrates suggests that
Anytus does not realize what slander is, and continues his dialogue
with Meno as to the definition of Virtue.
The concluding dialogue with Meno
After the discussion with Anytus, Socrates and
Meno return to the subject of whether Virtue can be taught. He
points out the similarities and differences between "true beliefs"
and "knowledge". He claims that whilst "true beliefs" may be as
useful to us as knowledge, they often fail to "stay in their place"
and must be "tethered" by anamnesis. This distinction
between "true beliefs" and "knowledge" forms the basis of the
philosophical definition of knowledge as "justified
true belief". "To sum up our enquiry," Socrates concludes, "the
result seems to be, if we are at all right in our view, that virtue
is neither natural nor acquired, but an instinct given by God to
the virtuous." Whereas in the Protagoras
knowledge is uncompromisingly this-wordly, in the Meno the theory
of recollection points to a link between knowledge and eternal
truths.
Meno and Protagoras
Menos theme is also being dealt in the dialogue
of Protagoras,
where, Plato finally puts Socrates to conclude with the opposite
conclusion 'That virtue can be taught.'
External links
wikisource Meno- Text of "Meno" on Project Gutenberg
- Meno on the Perseus Project translated by W.R.M. Lamb (1967) ISBN: 0674991834, 0674991842
References
Bibliography
Klein, Jacob.
A Commentary on Plato's Meno. Chapel Hill: University of North
Carolina Press, 1965.
meno in Arabic: مينو
meno in Bulgarian: Менон
meno in Danish: Menon
meno in German: Menon
meno in French: Ménon
meno in Icelandic: Menon (Platon)
meno in Italian: Menone (dialogo)
meno in Hungarian: Menón (dialógus)
meno in Norwegian: Menon
meno in Romanian: Menon (Platon)
meno in Russian: Менон (Платон)
meno in Finnish: Menon (dialogi)
meno in Ukrainian: Менон (Платон)
meno in Chinese: 美诺篇